Regulatory Compliance Is What Crypto Firms Need To Win Institutional Capital And Trust
Market Structure
As Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) hits new all-time highs and headlines, what institutions demand are trust signals; compliance is proving to be a non-negotiable frontrunner. In the mainstream financial sector, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), BlackRock Inc. (BLK), and other industry giants attracted that trust by developing strict, testable compliance programs. Now crypto is facing the same crossroads: treat compliance as a cost — or turn it into an advantage that draws capital.
84% of institutional investors expressed that regulatory compliance was their top concern when allocating to crypto, according to a 2025 survey, up from 72% in 2023. Moreover, 63% of them reported use of compliance tools such as transaction monitoring, AML, and KYC.
The third quarter of 2025 saw 28 billion net inflows, indicating that allocators are active when market structure and counterparties are managing risks. These will be credible only if custodians, service providers, and companies can meet institutional-grade compliance benchmarks.
NYDFS & FATF Signals: Real Time Risk Monitoring for Institutional Trust
Institutions are turning the page on “trust our company” marketing decks and relying on data-backed, verifiable monitoring; moreover, it’s actually written into supervision:
NYDFS extended blockchain analytics expectations to banks: The New York Department of Financial Services expanded blockchain analytics expectations to the banking sector, specifically including wallet screening, source-of-funds checks, around-the-system intelligence, and counterparty risk management. This guidance makes monitoring fall from “nice to have” into “expected controls.”
Global standard setters like FATF continue to tighten scrutiny: Latest FATF virtual asset updates point towards an ongoing lack of compliance with Travel Rule’s implementation and enforcement, marking an urgency in traceability and greater counterparty diligence.
This was how traditional finance earned its credibility. Custodians, brokers, and exchanges didn’t garner trust via marketing but rather by implementing controls that the market could test.