{"id":4005,"date":"2024-12-10T14:17:12","date_gmt":"2024-12-10T14:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/?p=4005"},"modified":"2024-12-10T14:17:12","modified_gmt":"2024-12-10T14:17:12","slug":"is-bitcoin-at-risk-what-googles-new-quantum-chip-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/?p=4005","title":{"rendered":"Is Bitcoin At Risk? What Google\u2019s New Quantum Chip Means"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>On December 9, Google\u2019s CEO Sundar Pichai revealed \u201cWillow,\u201d a quantum computing chip that he claims represents a pivotal milestone in the quest for scalable quantum systems \u2014raising immediate questions about its implications for Bitcoin\u2019s long-term cryptographic security. While quantum computing has long promised breakthroughs, Willow\u2019s reported ability to dramatically reduce error rates and handle previously unmanageable computational tasks has re-ignited debate over its implications for <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/amazon-files-proof-of-work-patent-using-cryptography\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener \">cryptography<\/a>, particularly Bitcoin\u2019s foundational security layers.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/sundarpichai\/status\/1866167429367468422\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">posted<\/a> on X, Pichai described Willow as a 105-qubit chip that can \u201creduce errors exponentially\u201d at scale\u2014something researchers have struggled to achieve for decades. He suggested that early benchmarks indicate Willow tackled a standard quantum problem in under five minutes, a task he said \u201cwould take a leading supercomputer over 10^25 years.\u201d<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Introducing Willow, our new state-of-the-art quantum computing chip with a breakthrough that can reduce errors exponentially as we scale up using more qubits, cracking a 30-year challenge in the field. In benchmark tests, Willow solved a standard computation in &lt;5 mins that would\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Sundar Pichai (@sundarpichai) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/sundarpichai\/status\/1866167429367468422?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">December 9, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Quantum computing\u2019s potential to solve problems at unprecedented speed has long been discussed in the context of cryptography\u2014both classical and elliptic-curve based systems. Bitcoin relies on two cryptographic pillars: ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) for securing private keys and SHA-256 for hashing. Both are considered robust against current classical computers. However, the arrival of powerful, error-corrected <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/ethereum-buterin-fortifies-the-future-of-finance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener \">quantum machines<\/a> could upend that assumption by making classical cryptographic puzzles trivial to solve.<\/p>\n<h2>Is Google\u2019s Willow A Threat For Bitcoin?<\/h2>\n<p>Shortly after Willow\u2019s unveiling, Bitcoin Libre CEO Ben Sigman <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/bensig\/status\/1866235429982523705\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">offered<\/a> a measured response on X. While acknowledging Willow\u2019s progress, he argues that Bitcoin\u2019s encryption is still beyond the immediate reach of today\u2019s quantum capabilities. He noted that exploiting Bitcoin\u2019s elliptic-curve signatures using Shor\u2019s algorithm would require \u201cover 1,000,000 qubits\u201d\u2014orders of magnitude beyond Willow\u2019s 105.<\/p>\n<p>Turning to the second layer of Bitcoin\u2019s security, SHA-256, Sigman points out that breaking it would demand \u201cmillions of physical qubits,\u201d a threshold far higher than what Willow or any current quantum system can approach. He concluded, \u201cBitcoin\u2019s cryptography remains SAFU \u2026 for now.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Charles Edwards, founder and CEO of Capriole Investments, <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/caprioleio\/status\/1866355221670302170\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">warns<\/a> that ignoring quantum computing\u2019s accelerating trajectory could be a grave oversight. Though he acknowledges the current gap between today\u2019s quantum hardware and the massive scale needed to crack Bitcoin, Edwards cautions against complacency.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe level of Quantum Computing skepticism today reminds me of the average person who spends 10 minutes researching Bitcoin and then dismissing it as valueless. Quantum Computing is real. It will change the world. MASSIVELY. QC will break Bitcoin if we do not upgrade it. The threat is real,\u201d Edwards warns.<\/p>\n<p>He points to research that suggests as few as 2,500 logical qubits\u2014well below the often cited \u201cmillions of qubits\u201d\u2014might be enough to challenge SHA-256. The difference between physical and logical qubits is crucial. While physical <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/quantum-computers-threat-to-crypto\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener \">qubits<\/a> are the raw building blocks, logical qubits emerge only after substantial error correction and resource overhead. Building a system with thousands of logical qubits currently requires a far greater number of physical qubits\u2014potentially millions.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, Edwards references various studies and forward-looking timelines, suggesting that many quantum computing firms, some of them publicly listed and giving forward guidance, believe they may reach around 3,000 logical qubits in as little as five years.<\/p>\n<p>He describes current skepticism about quantum\u2019s pace as akin to early dismissals of Bitcoin\u2019s value. Edwards stressed that while the exact timeline remains uncertain\u2014whether it\u2019s 3, 5, 10, or 15 years out\u2014delaying action is ill-advised.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBest case scenario, once we have agreed on a QC proof cryptography upgrade for Bitcoin, it will likely take 1 year just to move everyone (most) across to it. Further reducing the lead-time we have to act,\u201d Edwards writes.<br \/>\nAdding to the debate, Matteo Pellegrini, CEO and founder of The New Orange Pill App, highlighted that while the number 2,500 logical qubits may appear small, achieving it is no trivial feat.<\/p>\n<p>He remarked: \u201cThe referenced study indeed discusses the number of logical qubits potentially needed to break SHA-256. While it\u2019s true that only ~2500 logical qubits might suffice for breaking Bitcoin\u2019s encryption (e.g., private key derivation), achieving this in practice involves a massive leap in error correction, coherence time, and gate fidelity. Physical qubits required could number in the millions due to current inefficiencies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This discrepancy between physical and logical qubit counts underscores why some experts remain calm: scaling from a few hundred physical qubits (like Willow\u2019s 105) to millions is a colossal engineering undertaking. However, Edwards warns: \u201cMost firms are on track to achieve this in less than 5 years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-351264\" src=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/GeazTw7aoAApM4A.jpg?resize=944%2C528\" alt=\"Quantum Computer Roadmap\" width=\"944\" height=\"528\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/GeazTw7aoAApM4A.jpg?w=944 944w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/GeazTw7aoAApM4A.jpg?w=640 640w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/GeazTw7aoAApM4A.jpg?w=768 768w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/GeazTw7aoAApM4A.jpg?w=750 750w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 944px) 100vw, 944px\"><\/p>\n<p>At press time, BTC traded at $97,492.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-351265\" src=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?resize=1024%2C473\" alt=\"Bitcoin price\" width=\"1024\" height=\"473\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=3628 3628w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=640 640w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=768 768w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=980 980w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=1536 1536w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=2048 2048w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=750 750w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=1140 1140w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BTCUSDT_2024-12-10_10-59-06.png?w=3000 3000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On December 9, Google\u2019s CEO Sundar Pichai revealed \u201cWillow,\u201d a quantum computing chip that he claims represents a pivotal milestone in the quest for scalable quantum systems \u2014raising immediate questions about its implications for Bitcoin\u2019s long-term cryptographic security. While quantum computing has long promised breakthroughs, Willow\u2019s reported ability to dramatically reduce error rates and handle [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3,4,5],"class_list":["post-4005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-crypto","tag-doge","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4005\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}