{"id":77421,"date":"2026-03-24T01:01:33","date_gmt":"2026-03-24T01:01:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/?p=77421"},"modified":"2026-03-24T01:01:33","modified_gmt":"2026-03-24T01:01:33","slug":"sbf-legal-saga-continues-prosecutors-question-authenticity-of-ftx-founders-retrial-motion-letter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/?p=77421","title":{"rendered":"SBF Legal Saga Continues: Prosecutors Question Authenticity Of FTX Founder\u2019s Retrial Motion Letter"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FTX founder\u2019s legal saga continues as federal prosecutors question the authenticity of a retrial letter attributed to Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) due to major inconsistencies in signature, address, and delivery method.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SBF\u2019s Retrial Motion Letter Under Scrutiny<\/h2>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On Sunday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/innercitypress\/status\/2035938225475211525?s=20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">questioned<\/a> the authenticity of a letter submitted by Sam Bankman-Fried from prison in support of his motion for a new trial, citing inconsistencies in the signature, address, and delivery method.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the filing, prosecutors told Judge Lewis Kaplan that the Government did not object \u201cto a reasonable extension for the filing of the defendant\u2019s reply in support of his motion for a new trial.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, they affirmed that \u201cthere is reason to doubt\u201d that the letter, docketed March 16, was actually <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/ftx-sbf-cries-biden-lawfare-trump-pardon-pitch\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener \">submitted<\/a> by the former FTX CEO. As they stated, the letter was delivered via FedEx, and according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons\u2019 Program Statement 5800.16, inmates are not allowed to send mail via FedEx or other private carriers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition, the envelope indicates that the letter was sent by \u201cS. Bankman-Fried at Terminal Island DOC, San Pedro, CA 90731.\u201d Prosecutors noted that the BOP facility at Terminal Island is a Federal Correctional Institution (FCI), not a Department of Corrections (DOC) facility.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cWhile the return address indicates it was sent from \u2018San Pedro,\u2019 where the facility is located, FedEx tracking shows the package was picked up and shipped from Palo Alto or Menlo Park, California,\u201d the filing highlighted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-671135 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=980&amp;resize=980%2C553\" alt=\"FTX\" width=\"980\" height=\"553\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=2175 2175w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=640 640w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=768 768w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=980 980w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=1536 1536w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=2048 2048w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=750 750w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/HEEaz3fbYAAOlGG.jpeg?w=1140 1140w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 980px) 100vw, 980px\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Lastly, they also argued that the letter was signed with an \u201c\/s\/\u201d instead of the SBF\u2019s actual signature. This format is commonly used in electronic legal filings rather than physical prison correspondence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-03-16\/bankman-fried-s-mom-told-to-not-call-court-on-son-s-behalf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">previous<\/a> reports, Judge Kaplan had extended the FTX founder\u2019s deadline for SBF or his lawyers to request more time to reply to the government\u2019s arguments until March 23, but emphasized that the court doesn\u2019t accept phone calls from litigants or family members.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The judge\u2019s extension and disclaimer follow Barbara Fried\u2019s, SBF\u2019s mother, attempts to request additional time to file papers on her son\u2019s behalf, citing the FTX founder\u2019s limited prison access to files and an anticipated transfer.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DOJ Requests Denial Of FTX Founder\u2019s New Trial Bid<\/h2>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In November 2023, Bankman-Fried was found guilty of seven criminal counts, including fraud and conspiracy. He was later sentenced to 25 years in prison and ordered to pay back $11 billion to FTX customers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last year, SBF\u2019s lawyers <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/sbf-lawyers-ftx-founder-blocked-fair-defense\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener \">claimed<\/a> that the crypto-exchange founder was unjustly convicted and denied a fair opportunity to present his defense due to undue pressure from the media and prosecutors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In February, Bankman-Fried filed a motion for a new trial without assistance from his legal team, arguing new evidence could tilt the scales in his favor. In his new-trial bid, he affirmed that the testimony from two former FTX executives, Ryan Salame and Daniel Chapsky, could have weakened the government\u2019s case against SBF at trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moreover, he claimed he was a victim of a \u201cweaponized\u201d Biden-era Department of Justice, while requesting a new judge under the argument that Kaplan had \u201cmanifest prejudice\u201d toward SBF.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Department of Justice urged Judge Kaplan to deny Bankman-Fried\u2019s request for a retrial earlier this month, asserting that the defense has not come close to meeting the legal requirements necessary for one.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/sbf-retrial-bid-meets-resistance-from-us-prosecutors\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener \">reported<\/a> by Bitcoinist, prosecutors refuted SBF\u2019s claims. They stated that the two former FTX executives were already known to the defense prior to the 2023 trial, rendering any new evidence they presented as irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-671134 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=978&amp;resize=978%2C660\" alt=\"FTX, TOTAL\" width=\"978\" height=\"660\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=1850 1850w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=623 623w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=768 768w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=978 978w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=1536 1536w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=750 750w, https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/TOTAL_2026-03-23_09-18-23.png?w=1140 1140w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 978px) 100vw, 978px\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>FTX founder\u2019s legal saga continues as federal prosecutors question the authenticity of a retrial letter attributed to Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) due to major inconsistencies in signature, address, and delivery method. SBF\u2019s Retrial Motion Letter Under Scrutiny On Sunday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) questioned the authenticity of a letter submitted by Sam Bankman-Fried from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3,4,5],"class_list":["post-77421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-crypto","tag-doge","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=77421"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77421\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=77421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=77421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=77421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}