{"id":78528,"date":"2026-04-01T05:18:12","date_gmt":"2026-04-01T05:18:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/?p=78528"},"modified":"2026-04-01T05:18:12","modified_gmt":"2026-04-01T05:18:12","slug":"dont-panic-heres-how-crypto-resists-quantum-risks-according-to-cz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dogewisperer.com\/?p=78528","title":{"rendered":"Don\u2019t Panic: Here\u2019s How Crypto Resists Quantum Risks, According to CZ"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u201cAt a high level, all crypto has to do is upgrade to quantum-resistant algorithms. So, no need to panic,\u201d said CZ on X on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

His comments followed the release<\/a> of a research paper from Google on Monday, warning that quantum computers need far less power than originally thought to break Bitcoin and Ethereum cryptography.<\/p>\n

CZ said<\/a> that it was hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world, and that there will likely be many debates over which algorithms to use, leading to some forks.<\/p>\n

\u201cSome dead projects may not upgrade at all,\u201d he said, adding that it might be good to \u201ccleanse out those projects anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cFundamentally, it\u2019s always easier to encrypt than decrypt, more computing power is always good, [and] crypto will stay, post quantum.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Satoshi\u2019s Coins Could be a Problem<\/h2>\n

CZ questioned Satoshi\u2019s stash of Bitcoins, an estimated 1 million BTC.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cIf those coins move, then it means he\/she is still around, which is interesting to know,\u201d he said. However, if they don\u2019t move in a certain period of time, \u201cit might be better to lock or effectively burn those addresses so that they don\u2019t go to the first hacker who cracks it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Google mentioned these dormant assets in its paper, stating that they were all locked behind P2PK scripts \u2014 the oldest and most quantum-vulnerable script type.<\/p>\n

P2PK scripts record the public key directly on the blockchain, meaning there is no hash protecting it. A quantum attacker wouldn\u2019t need to wait for a transaction, as the public key is already visible and the coins are permanently exposed to \u201cat-rest attacks.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bitcoin research outlet TFTC also played down the Google warning, stating<\/a>, \u201cthey didn\u2019t run the attack. They published a zero-knowledge proof that their math works, then cited national security.\u201d<\/p>\n

Current quantum computers are a factor of 100,000 below what is required to break elliptic-curve cryptography, they said.<\/p>\n

Bitcoin developers are already working on solutions such as \u201cSHRIMPS,\u201d which are \u201cpost-quantum signatures three times smaller than NIST standards, built for Bitcoin\u2019s block space constraints and BIP-360 \u2013 a quantum-resistant output type already live on testnet.\u201d<\/p>\n

Crypto entrepreneur Nic Carter disagreed<\/a>, stating that \u201cthere\u2019s no BIP, no proposed PQ [post quantum] scheme, no roadmap, and most major devs continue to deny the risk.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Threat is Real Say Researchers<\/h2>\n

Crypto venture capitalist Luke Martin found an old quote from Satoshi addressing the threat that would render BTC worthless if it happened suddenly.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf it happens gradually, we can still transition to something stronger. When you run the upgraded software for the first time, it will re-sign all your money with the new, stronger algorithm,\u201d said Satoshi in 2010.<\/p>\n

\n

This is the only public comment Satoshi ever made about quantum computing risk to Bitcoin<\/p>\n

Back in 2010 a user \u201cllama\u201d asked what would happen if signatures were compromised due to quantum computers and whether it would make BTC worthless<\/p>\n

\u201cTrue, if it happened suddenly. If it\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/euPn2mlRTA<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Luke Martin (@VentureCoinist) March 31, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n